You dont have javascript enabled! Please enable it! 1971.04.14 | Rhetoric And Reality | Guardian - সংগ্রামের নোটবুক

Rhetoric And Reality

“Where, after three weeks of messy bloodshed, do the military rulers of Pakistan now stand? Superficially they prosper. Bangladesh’s roving bands of “liberation fighters” have never and will never cope with the Pakistani Army in force. That force is being deployed to flatten urban resistance. Yahya Khan will soon have most cities and towns on a tight rein. He will also have all the Chinese spare parts overflying rights, and hire purchase rhetoric he can take. For the moment, the Awami League “miscreants” are dead, incarcerated or negligible. Pakistan is cowed, but united.
“The Eastern prospect, in short, is long, weary gloom-economic stagnation, starvation, murders, the slow growth of extremism. Even Chinese friendship has a touch of poison in the embrace. Peking may care little if Maoist Bengalis like Maulana Bhasani find themselves at the wrong end of Yahya’s bayonets: anything to the worst the pro-American Sheikh Mujib. But once the Awami League is defunct and East Pakistan is given over to wild men of rebellion, then only the most stupid of generals will be surprised to find Chinese arms in every guerilla cache. And in the West there lies bleakness too. Mr. Bhutto may rejoice at army action today; but he will not rejoice long if it keeps him from the power he won at the ballot box. Pakistan is a nation in hock to the World Bank and to the aid-givers of the world: They are already turning away; gorged on brutality Pakistani defense police (and the whole existence of the generals) rests on confrontation with India over Kashmir. Pakistan alleges that India holds the Pakistani loving Kashmiris in check by steely repression. It is the most ludicrous of cases now, as the junta of Islamabad openly exercises just such repression on 75 million bonafide Pakistanis. The United Nations will surely collapse in bitter laughter if Kashmir comes up again. The issue is as dead as the students of Dacca University.
“Nobody can tell precisely what Yahya’s strategists whispered in his ear three weeks ago. Nobody can tell, but anyone can deduce. They appear to have thought that cutting off the head would kill Bengali nationalism: precisely the reverse. They appear to have forgotten about world opinion. They appear, most insanely of all, to have ruled India out of the military calculations, so that the uncontrolled border and aid seeping in has them as much by the throat as proliferation- diplomatic. complications. To reiterate: the Bangladesh affair is not a second Biafra or the fruits of more interminable wrangling between Delhi and Rawalpindi. It arose simply when a well conducted, peaceful election produced a result the army could not stand. Sheikh Mujib himself has not, in any certain sense, declared Bengali independence. He was not asking essentially for more than the programme he legally fought and won the election on. Of course there are shades of gray; But influential and intelligent Pakistanis in the west can stop that carnage tomorrow if they add.up the balance sheet and put their soldiers in economic chains. This is not a SinoSoviet slanging match about Marxist technicalities. It is, at root, a simple matter; of freedom, of morality, and of humanity”

Reference: Editorial, Guardian, London, April 14, 1971